Day 102 of 120 Spatial Difficulty 3/10

Teen spatial ability predicts adult STEM achievement decades later

Quick answer

Teen spatial ability predicts adult STEM achievement decades later. Today's question (Spatial ability and STEM) asks about a finding from Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. in 2009. The correct option is STEM degree completion and creative occupational achievement decades later — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Wai, Lubinski, and Benbow (2009) followed adolescents over decades and reported that spatial ability — independent of math and verbal scores — predicted:

  1. A Performance only in art and design careers
  2. B STEM degree completion and creative occupational achievement decades later
  3. C Nothing measurable beyond standard intelligence tests
  4. D Only short-term test performance, not real-world outcomes
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — STEM degree completion and creative occupational achievement decades later

Drawing on a 50-year longitudinal dataset of nearly half a million U.S. adolescents, Wai, Lubinski, and Benbow (2009) found that spatial ability assessed in adolescence uniquely predicted whether participants later earned STEM degrees, secured patents, and produced refereed scientific publications — over and above math and verbal SAT scores. The result reframed spatial reasoning as a 'neglected dimension' of talent identification that standard college-admissions tests largely ignore. It also provided one of the largest evidence bases for the claim that spatial skills, alongside numerical and verbal skills, channel people toward technical careers.

About the source

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.