Holding two contradictory answers diagnoses two reasoning systems

Correct: B — Cases where a person simultaneously holds an intuitive judgment and a contradicting reflective conclusion about the same problem

Sloman (1996) argued that dissociations within a single mind — feeling that a conjunction of events is more probable than its component while knowing it cannot be — provide a stronger case for two systems than mere differences across people or tasks. He proposed an associative system (similarity- and contiguity-based) and a rule-based system (formal, symbolic), with the two often arriving at different answers to the same problem. The framework anticipated later dual-process accounts and is still cited as a careful articulation of how 'two systems' can be diagnosed without overclaiming neuroanatomical separation.