Day 143 of 150 Logic Difficulty 5/10

Simple one-reason heuristics can outperform complex regression

Quick answer

Simple one-reason heuristics can outperform complex regression. Today's question (Fast-and-frugal heuristics) asks about a finding from Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. in 1996. The correct option is Match or out-predict more complex strategies in real-world environments while using less information — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Gigerenzer & Goldstein's (1996) 'fast and frugal' heuristics work demonstrated that simple decision rules like 'Take the Best' can:

  1. A Always lose to multiple-regression models in cross-validation
  2. B Match or out-predict more complex strategies in real-world environments while using less information
  3. C Only succeed with unlimited time and information
  4. D Be rejected as cognitive illusions
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Match or out-predict more complex strategies in real-world environments while using less information

Gigerenzer & Goldstein (1996) compared 'Take the Best' — a one-reason decision heuristic that uses cues in order of validity and stops at the first discriminating cue — against weighted-additive models (including multiple regression) on real-world prediction tasks (e.g., German city populations). In out-of-sample prediction, the simple heuristic matched or beat the more information-greedy strategies. The work helped reframe cognitive heuristics from 'biases that hurt' (the heuristics-and-biases tradition) to 'ecologically rational adaptations' that exploit redundancy and noise in the environment. The framework grounds modern adaptive-toolbox theories of decision-making.

About the source

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650–669.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.