Day 145 of 150 Logic Difficulty 8/10

Belief bias mixes biased reasoning with biased response selection

Quick answer

Belief bias mixes biased reasoning with biased response selection. Today's question (Belief bias in syllogistic reasoning) asks about a finding from Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. in 2000. The correct option is Two distinct components — biased reasoning (logic-by-belief interaction) and biased response selection (acceptance threshold shifts) — that both contribute — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Klauer, Musch & Naumer (2000) provided a multinomial-modeling account of belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Their key conclusion was that belief bias arises from:

  1. A A single mechanism of belief-driven response
  2. B Two distinct components — biased reasoning (logic-by-belief interaction) and biased response selection (acceptance threshold shifts) — that both contribute
  3. C A short-term working-memory limitation only
  4. D A non-cognitive demand-characteristic effect
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Two distinct components — biased reasoning (logic-by-belief interaction) and biased response selection (acceptance threshold shifts) — that both contribute

Klauer, Musch & Naumer (2000) applied multinomial processing-tree modeling to large syllogism datasets and decomposed the belief-bias effect into two latent processes: (1) a tendency for beliefs to bias the reasoning process itself — people scrutinize unbelievable conclusions more carefully than believable ones — and (2) a response-bias component, in which the threshold for endorsing a conclusion shifts toward accepting believable claims regardless of validity. Both components contribute, and their relative size depends on instructions, time pressure, and conclusion plausibility. The dual-component picture has framed subsequent dual-process accounts of analytical reasoning.

About the source

Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 107(4), 852–884.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.