Day 109 of 120 Speed Difficulty 6/10

Diffusion models split RT into drift, caution, and non-decision time

Quick answer

Diffusion models split RT into drift, caution, and non-decision time. Today's question (Diffusion-model decomposition) asks about a finding from Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. in 2007. The correct option is Drift rate (information quality), boundary separation (caution), and non-decision time (encoding + motor) — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

The EZ diffusion model of Wagenmakers, van der Maas, and Grasman (2007) decomposes choice reaction times into separable components for:

  1. A Motivation, mood, and memory only
  2. B Drift rate (information quality), boundary separation (caution), and non-decision time (encoding + motor)
  3. C Visual contrast and auditory loudness only
  4. D A single global "speed" parameter and nothing else
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Drift rate (information quality), boundary separation (caution), and non-decision time (encoding + motor)

Building on Ratcliff's diffusion model, Wagenmakers, van der Maas, and Grasman (2007) introduced an EZ parameter-recovery method that maps the mean RT, variance of RT, and proportion of correct responses onto three psychologically interpretable parameters: drift rate (rate of evidence accumulation toward the correct boundary), boundary separation (how much evidence the participant requires before responding — i.e., speed–accuracy caution), and non-decision time (perceptual encoding plus motor output). The framework lets researchers separate 'she's slow because she's cautious' from 'she's slow because the evidence is noisy' — a distinction that simple mean-RT comparisons routinely conflate.

About the source

Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 3–22.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.