Day 128 of 150 Memory Difficulty 4/10

Self-testing crushes re-reading on long-delay retention

Quick answer

Self-testing crushes re-reading on long-delay retention. Today's question (Retrieval practice (testing effect)) asks about a finding from Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. in 2011. The correct option is Larger gains in long-term retention, with benefits that grow as the retention interval lengthens — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Roediger & Butler (2011) summarized decades of work on the testing effect. Compared to additional study, retrieval practice produces:

  1. A No advantage on delayed tests
  2. B A short-term boost that disappears within 24 hours
  3. C Larger gains in long-term retention, with benefits that grow as the retention interval lengthens
  4. D Benefits only when retrieval is followed by explicit feedback
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: C — Larger gains in long-term retention, with benefits that grow as the retention interval lengthens

Roediger & Butler (2011) synthesized over a century of research showing that the act of retrieval — practicing answering questions, generating, or self-testing — yields more durable long-term retention than equivalent time spent re-reading. The advantage typically appears small or absent on immediate tests but grows with delay; at delays of a week or longer, retrieval practice can yield substantially higher recall than restudy. The mechanism likely involves both elaborative semantic re-encoding and recruitment of overlapping retrieval cues. The finding underwrites spaced-retrieval study schedules and 'low-stakes quizzing' classroom recommendations.

About the source

Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.