Day 132 of 150 Spatial Difficulty 6/10

Disoriented animals rely on a geometry-only spatial module

Quick answer

Disoriented animals rely on a geometry-only spatial module. Today's question (Geometric module) asks about a finding from Cheng, K. in 1986. The correct option is Made systematic 'rotational' errors, treating geometrically equivalent corners as identical even when distinguishable by featural cues — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Cheng's (1986) classic disorientation experiments with rats found that, after disorientation in a rectangular arena, rats:

  1. A Used wall colors and patterns to find the correct corner without error
  2. B Made systematic 'rotational' errors, treating geometrically equivalent corners as identical even when distinguishable by featural cues
  3. C Failed at the task entirely without further training
  4. D Always navigated by olfactory cues alone
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Made systematic 'rotational' errors, treating geometrically equivalent corners as identical even when distinguishable by featural cues

Cheng (1986) trained rats to find food in one corner of a rectangular arena marked with distinctive colors, patterns, and odors at each corner. After disorientation, rats systematically searched both the correct corner and its diagonal opposite — the geometrically equivalent corner — even though featural cues unambiguously distinguished them. He argued for a 'geometric module' that encodes the metric shape of the space (which long and short walls form which angles) but is initially impenetrable to non-geometric information. Subsequent work in human children, fish, and chicks largely replicated the rotational-error pattern, and the geometric-module hypothesis remains a central debate in spatial cognition.

About the source

Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition, 23(2), 149–178.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.