Day 139 of 150 Speed Difficulty 6/10

Five decades of speed–IQ research: small-to-moderate, but robust

Quick answer

Five decades of speed–IQ research: small-to-moderate, but robust. Today's question (Speed of information processing and intelligence) asks about a finding from Sheppard, L. D., & Vernon, P. A. in 2008. The correct option is Moderate, robust across many tasks (RT, inspection time, evoked-potential latencies), and broadly comparable in size to working-memory–IQ correlations — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Sheppard & Vernon's (2008) meta-analytic review of speed of information processing and intelligence concluded that the speed–IQ relationship is:

  1. A Negligible across paradigms
  2. B Moderate, robust across many tasks (RT, inspection time, evoked-potential latencies), and broadly comparable in size to working-memory–IQ correlations
  3. C Strong only for choice RT and zero for inspection time
  4. D Driven entirely by motor-output latency
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Moderate, robust across many tasks (RT, inspection time, evoked-potential latencies), and broadly comparable in size to working-memory–IQ correlations

Sheppard & Vernon (2008) reviewed roughly 50 years of correlations between speed measures (simple and choice RT, inspection time, evoked-potential latencies, mental scanning) and psychometric intelligence. Across a wide variety of paradigms and samples, speed measures show small-to-moderate negative correlations with g (faster, higher IQ), with mean correlations around r = -0.2 to -0.4. The associations are robust to different reliability corrections and broadly similar in magnitude to working-memory–IQ correlations. The review reinforced processing-speed as a foundational individual-difference construct without claiming it singularly explains intelligence.

About the source

Sheppard, L. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 535–551.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.