Day 140 of 150 Speed Difficulty 7/10

Aging slowing is mostly central, not sensory or motor

Quick answer

Aging slowing is mostly central, not sensory or motor. Today's question (Cognitive slowing in aging) asks about a finding from Bashore, T. R., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. in 1997. The correct option is Reflects slowing primarily in central decision and response-selection stages, with relatively spared sensory and motor stages — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Bashore, Ridderinkhof & van der Molen (1997) used reaction-time decomposition to argue that age-related cognitive slowing:

  1. A Is uniform across all stages of processing
  2. B Reflects slowing primarily in central decision and response-selection stages, with relatively spared sensory and motor stages
  3. C Is fully attributable to peripheral nerve conduction
  4. D Disappears once practice is equated
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Reflects slowing primarily in central decision and response-selection stages, with relatively spared sensory and motor stages

Bashore, Ridderinkhof & van der Molen (1997) reviewed RT-decomposition studies — additive-factors logic, ERP latencies, and the locus-of-slack technique — and argued against a uniform 'general slowing' view of cognitive aging. Sensory encoding (e.g., P1, N1 latencies) and motor execution show only modest age effects, while response-selection and decision processes (e.g., P3 latency, choice-RT lengthening) show much larger ones. The pattern points to age-related slowing concentrated in central, controlled processing — important for designing interventions that target the bottleneck rather than peripheral function.

About the source

Bashore, T. R., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (1997). The decline of cognitive processing speed in old age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(6), 163–169.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.