Day 141 of 150 Logic Difficulty 5/10

Smart and rational are separable abilities you can measure apart

Quick answer

Smart and rational are separable abilities you can measure apart. Today's question (Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking (CART)) asks about a finding from Stanovich, K. E. in 2016. The correct option is Capture cognitive capacity but only a subset of the components of rational thought — separable 'mindware' and reflective dispositions add unique variance — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Stanovich's (2016) Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking (CART) was developed because measures of intelligence:

  1. A Are perfect predictors of rational thinking
  2. B Capture cognitive capacity but only a subset of the components of rational thought — separable 'mindware' and reflective dispositions add unique variance
  3. C Cannot be measured reliably across cultures
  4. D Are unrelated to performance on cognitive tasks
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Capture cognitive capacity but only a subset of the components of rational thought — separable 'mindware' and reflective dispositions add unique variance

Stanovich (2016) argued that intelligence tests primarily capture algorithmic-level processing capacity but largely miss two further components of rational thought: 'mindware' (acquired probabilistic, statistical, and logical rules) and reflective dispositions (the tendency to engage analytic processing rather than default to intuition). The CART assesses these separately across belief-bias, framing, base-rate neglect, probabilistic reasoning, and dispositional inventories. Findings show that high-IQ individuals can be smart but irrational ('dysrationalia'). The framework helped formalize why bias-correction training generalizes more from mindware than from raw reasoning ability.

About the source

Stanovich, K. E. (2016). The Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 23–34.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.