Day 123 of 150 Pattern Difficulty 6/10

Adding context can speed search via emergent configural features

Quick answer

Adding context can speed search via emergent configural features. Today's question (Configural superiority effect) asks about a finding from Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., & Stoever, R. J. in 1977. The correct option is Can speed target detection by creating an emergent feature absent from the simpler base display — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

In Pomerantz, Sager & Stoever's (1977) configural superiority paradigm, adding a non-informative context element to a discrimination display:

  1. A Always slows target detection
  2. B Can speed target detection by creating an emergent feature absent from the simpler base display
  3. C Has no effect because attention selects only the diagnostic element
  4. D Reverses the perceptual interference predicted by Garner
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Can speed target detection by creating an emergent feature absent from the simpler base display

Pomerantz, Sager & Stoever (1977) compared discrimination of a single oblique line against discrimination of the same line plus an identical context line that, together, formed an arrow versus a triangle. Counterintuitively, the more complex display was discriminated faster. The added context creates an emergent feature — closure, symmetry, or a salient angle — that the visual system uses preferentially. This 'configural superiority effect' is now a textbook demonstration that perception is not a strict bottom-up summation of parts: wholes can be more salient and easier to classify than their constituents, anticipating modern Gestalt-aligned views of grouping and emergent structure in vision.

About the source

Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., & Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(3), 422–435.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.