Day 124 of 150 Pattern Difficulty 5/10
Concepts cluster by family resemblance, not strict definitions
Quick answer
Concepts cluster by family resemblance, not strict definitions. Today's question (Family-resemblance categories) asks about a finding from Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. in 1975. The correct option is Family-resemblance structures whose members share overlapping but non-defining features — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.
Today's question
Rosch & Mervis (1975) showed that natural categories like 'fruit' or 'furniture' are best characterized as:
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct: B — Family-resemblance structures whose members share overlapping but non-defining features
Rosch & Mervis (1975) demonstrated that prototypicality ratings within a category (e.g., 'robin' vs. 'penguin' for 'bird') correlate strongly with the number of features a member shares with other members of the same category and the number of features it does not share with contrasting categories. Natural categories thus exhibit graded, family-resemblance structure rather than crisp definitional boundaries. This empirical work, alongside Eleanor Rosch's broader prototype theory, displaced classical 'necessary and sufficient features' accounts and reshaped how psychology, linguistics, and computer science model concepts and category learning across many domains.
About the source
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.
Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.
More from the Cognition Bible
Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.