Day 124 of 150 Pattern Difficulty 5/10

Concepts cluster by family resemblance, not strict definitions

Quick answer

Concepts cluster by family resemblance, not strict definitions. Today's question (Family-resemblance categories) asks about a finding from Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. in 1975. The correct option is Family-resemblance structures whose members share overlapping but non-defining features — full explanation, primary source, and glossary cross-links below.

Today's question

Rosch & Mervis (1975) showed that natural categories like 'fruit' or 'furniture' are best characterized as:

  1. A Strict logical sets defined by necessary and sufficient features
  2. B Family-resemblance structures whose members share overlapping but non-defining features
  3. C Hierarchies organized purely by superordinate–subordinate relations
  4. D Random clusters with no internal structure
Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct: B — Family-resemblance structures whose members share overlapping but non-defining features

Rosch & Mervis (1975) demonstrated that prototypicality ratings within a category (e.g., 'robin' vs. 'penguin' for 'bird') correlate strongly with the number of features a member shares with other members of the same category and the number of features it does not share with contrasting categories. Natural categories thus exhibit graded, family-resemblance structure rather than crisp definitional boundaries. This empirical work, alongside Eleanor Rosch's broader prototype theory, displaced classical 'necessary and sufficient features' accounts and reshaped how psychology, linguistics, and computer science model concepts and category learning across many domains.

About the source

Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.

Every Cognition Bible question cites a primary source — a paper, book chapter, or monograph that exists, that we can point to on Google Scholar, and whose finding the question accurately summarizes. No fabricated authority strings, no name-drops without paper-level grounding.

More from the Cognition Bible

Done with today's question? Play the FOKIQ Daily — six puzzles across six cognitive domains, free, every day.